4.6 Article

High-performance solution-processable flexible and transparent conducting electrodes with embedded Cu mesh

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY C
卷 6, 期 16, 页码 4389-4395

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8tc00307f

关键词

-

资金

  1. Global Research Laboratory Program of the National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea - Ministry of Science, Information and Communication Technologies and Future Planning [NRF-2015K1A1A2029679]
  2. Nano.Material Technology Development Program of the National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea - Ministry of Science, Information and Communication Technologies and Future Planning [NRF-2015M3A7B4050306]
  3. KOREA RESEARCH INSTITUTE of CHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY (KRICT) [SKO1707C10]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Alternative transparent and conducting electrodes (TCEs) that can overcome the practical limitations of the existing TCEs have been explored. Although network structures of metal nanowires have been investigated for TCEs because of their excellent performance, characteristics such as high junction resistances, poor surface roughness, and randomly entangled NW networks still pose challenges. Here, we report cost-effective and solution-processable metallic mesh TCEs consisting of a Cu-mesh embedded in a flexible PDMS substrate. The unprecedented structures of the Cu-mesh TCEs offer considerable advantages over previous approaches, including high performance, surface smoothness, excellent flexibility, electromechanical stability, and thermal stability. Our Cu-mesh TCEs provide a transmittance of 96% at 550 nm and a sheet resistance of 0.1 Omega sq(-1), as well as extremely high figures of merit, reaching up to 1.9 x 10(4), which are the highest reported values among recent studies. Finally, we demonstrate high-performance transparent heaters based on Cu-mesh TCEs and in situ color tuning of cholesteric liquid crystals (CLCs) using them, confirming the uniform spatial electrical conductivity as well as the reproducibility and reliability of the electrode.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据