4.1 Article

Assessing the Social and Physical Contexts of Children's Leisure-Time Physical Activity: An Ecological Momentary Assessment Study

期刊

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH PROMOTION
卷 26, 期 3, 页码 135-142

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.4278/ajhp.100211-QUAN-43

关键词

Exercise; Physical Activity; Built Environment; Family; Repeated Measures; Prevention Research

资金

  1. NCI NIH HHS [R01 CA123243, R01-CA-123243] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose. To use Ecological Momentau Assessment with mobile phones to describe where and with whom children's leisure-time physical activity occurs. Design. Repeated assessmentl. across 4 days (Friday Monday) during nonschool time (20 total). Setting. Chino, California, and surrounding communities. Subjects. Primarily low to middle income children (N = 121; aged 9-13 years; g = 11.0 years, SD = 1.2 years.; 52% male, 38% Hispanic/Latino). Measures. Electronic surveys measured current activity (e.g., active play/sports/exercise, watching TV/movies), social company (e.g., family, friends, alone), physical location (e.g., home, outdoors, school), and other perceived contextual features (e.g., safety, traffic, vegetation, distance from home). Analysis. Multilevel linear and ntultinomial logistic regression. Results. Most of children's physical activity occurred outdoors (away from home) (42%), followed by at home (indoors) (30%), front/backyard (at home) (8%), someone else's house (8%), at a gym/recreation center (3%), and other locations (9%). Children's physical activity took place most often with multiple categories of people together (e.g., friends and family) (39%), followed by family members. only (32%), alone (15%), and with friends only (13%). Age, weight status, income, and racial/ethnic differences in physical activity contexts were observed. Conclusions. The most frequently reported contexts for children's leisure time physical activity were outdoors and with family members and friends together. (Am J Health Promot 2012;26[3]:135-142.)

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据