4.6 Article

Collagen structure regulates MSCs behavior by MMPs involved cell-matrix interactions

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY B
卷 6, 期 2, 页码 312-326

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7tb02377d

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51403134]
  2. National Key Technology Support Program of China [2012BAI42G01]
  3. Science and Technology Support Program of Sichuan Province [2016SZ0008]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Various scaffolds have been studied in the formation of cell niches and regulation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) behaviors. Collagen serves as one of the most promising materials for tissue engineering, but the cell-matrix interactions between MSCs and collagen are still poorly understood. In this study, we prepared methacrylated collagen (CMA) and gelatin (GMA) to form photo cross-linking hydrogels. The structure, morphology, mechanical properties and degradation behaviors of the derivatives and hydrogels were characterized and it was found that the advanced structure was the major difference between collagen and gelatin hydrogels. MSCs were encapsulated in the hydrogels and cultured for 14 days in vitro, with or without the tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase (TIMP). The CCK-8 and CLSM demonstrated that the cells in the CMA hydrogels showed better spreading and proliferation than those in GMA hydrogels. The qRT-PCR and quantitative protein assay verified the inhibition effect of TIMP on metalloproteinases (MMPs). Since the inhibited MMPs led to inferior MSCs adhesion and proliferation, we considered that the appropriate degradation by MMPs would generate more bioactive domains and improve the cell microenvironment. Immunofluorescence staining further proved that the distribution of vitronectin was significantly related to MMP-1 and MMP-2. It was concluded that the differences in the advanced structures of the scaffold materials were amplified to significant differences in multiple biological cell-matrix interactions, and finally led to different cellular fates.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据