4.6 Article

Oral administration of highly bright Cr3+ doped ZnGa2O4 nanocrystals for &ITin vivo &ITtargeted imaging of orthotopic breast cancer

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY B
卷 6, 期 10, 页码 1508-1518

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7tb03148c

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81471657, 81527901]
  2. 1000 Plan for Young Talents
  3. Jiangsu Specially Appointed Professorship
  4. Jiangsu Provincial program for innovative and entrepreneurial talents
  5. Jiangsu Provincial Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection
  6. Priority Academic Development Program of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Near-infrared (NIR) long lasting persistent luminescence nanoparticles (PLNPs) have attracted considerable attention in the area of in vivo bioimaging, due to their background-free luminescence characteristics and deep tissue penetration. However, the low fluorescence quantum yield and short afterglow of the currently available PLNPs limit their applications. Here, water-soluble Cr3+-doped ZnGa2O4 PLNPs with the highest quantum yield (eta = 20%) ever reported, bright NIR emission, and excellent colloidal stability were successfully prepared by a one-step hydrothermal method. The afterglow of the resultant nanocrystals lasted for more than 5 days and could be repeatedly reactivated by the light (lambda = 657 nm) of a portable light emitting diode lamp after decay. These nanocrystals were functionalized with alpha, omega-dicarboxyl-terminated poly(ethylene glycol) and poly(acrylic acid) to improve their stability and biocompatibility, so that they could be conjugated with a c(RGDyK) peptide and labeled with Tc-99m for targeted imaging of orthotopic breast cancer by afterglow luminescence imaging and single-photon emission computed tomography imaging. Our NIR-PLNP probes can effectively avoid tissue auto-fluorescence and the light scattering caused by continuous excitation during the diagnosis of cancer.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据