4.6 Article

Partially amorphous nickel-iron layered double hydroxide nanosheet arrays for robust bifunctional electrocatalysis

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 6, 期 33, 页码 16121-16129

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8ta05054f

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21501112, 21390411, 21701102, 21535004, 91753111]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2018JL009]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bifunctional electrocatalysts that can boost energy-related reactions are urgently in demand for pursual of dual and even multiple targets towards practical applications such as energy conversion, clean fuel production and pollution treatment. Herein, we highlight that an in situ grown nickel-iron layered double hydroxide (NiFe LDH) nanosheet array catalyst with partially amorphous characteristics, rich native Ni3+ ions and an optimal Ni:Fe ratio can exhibit robust performances on both the oxygen evolution reaction (OER) and the urea oxidation reaction (UOR). Benefitting from the partially amorphous feature, the catalytically active high-valence species are easy to generate and stabilize, thus further realizing enhanced electrooxidation activity with the aid of an internal 2D charge transfer pathway and native Ni3+ ions. As expected, the partially amorphous catalyst exhibits a higher OER current of 284.4 mA cm(-2) at an overpotential of 500 mV, which shows 2.2-10.0 times enhancement than the counterparts with various Ni:Fe ratios. In addition, the UOR current density of the partially amorphous catalyst at 1.8 V vs. RHE shows 1.6 and 2.4 times increment relative to fully amorphous and highly crystalline catalysts, and 2.7-9.4 fold larger than the catalysts with other Ni:Fe ratios. The optimization strategy of designing the partially amorphous bifunctional catalyst in this work may broaden the way of searching for advanced electrocatalysts for simultaneous waste water treatment and clean energy production.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据