4.6 Article

Highly durable solid oxide fuel cells: suppressing chemical degradation via rational design of a diffusion-blocking layer

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 6, 期 31, 页码 15083-15094

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8ta04974b

关键词

-

资金

  1. Technology Development Program to Solve Climate Changes through the National Research Foundation (NRF) of Korea - Ministry of Science, ICT [NRF-2016M1A2A2940148]
  2. institutional research program of Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) technology offers tremendous potential for highly efficient and clean power generation. However, its commercialization has lagged owing to the lack of long-term stability. Among the various sources of performance degradation, the interdiffusion between the cathode and electrolyte has been identified as a predominant factor. Herein, we demonstrate a highly reliable diffusion-blocking layer that completely suppresses detrimental chemical interactions at elevated temperatures. This diffusion-blocking layer is constructed via a bilayer approach, in which the top and bottom layers perform individual functions to precisely control the bulk and interfacial properties. Harnessing two types of specially designed nanoparticles for each part enables the realization of the desired film structure. Consequently, the formation of insulating phases and decomposition of the cathode are effectively prevented, resulting in a remarkable improvement in performance and stability. The scalability and feasibility of mass production are verified via the fabrication of large cells (10 cm x 10 cm) and a multi-cell stack. The stack in which the bilayer technique is implemented exhibits an extremely low degradation rate of 0.23% kh(-1), which fulfills the strict lifetime requirement for market penetration. This work highlights a scalable, cost-effective, and reproducible method for the production of highly durable multilayer energy devices, including SOFCs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据