4.6 Article

Optimisation of functional properties in lead-free BiFeO3-BaTiO3 ceramics through La3+ substitution strategy

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 6, 期 13, 页码 5378-5397

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7ta09497c

关键词

-

资金

  1. project Phase transitions, magnetotransport, magnetocaloric, magnetoelectric phenomena in strongly correlated electron systems [0203-2016-0009]
  2. National Education of Turkish Republic

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper is concerned with the structure and functional properties of bismuth ferrite-barium titanate, 0.75BiFeO(3)-0.25BaTiO(3), solid solutions. Such materials are attracting attention due to their potential applications in high temperature piezoelectric transducers for use in demanding environments in process monitoring, for example. The article focuses on the mechanism of incorporation of the minor dopant lanthanum oxide, either in the form of isovalent or donor-type substitution. It is shown that the development of chemical heterogeneity in the form of core-shell grain microstructures, linked to donor-type substitution, plays a key role in controlling the functional behaviour. The use of an airquenching procedure results in dramatic improvements in the ferroelectric properties, accompanied by a transformation of the shell regions from a pseudo-cubic, Pm (3) over barm, to rhombohedral, R3c, structure. These observations are interpreted in terms of a novel mechanism involving nanoscale phase separation in the 'shell' regions during slow cooling, which impedes the development of ferroelectric ordering and leads to the formation of a nano-polar relaxor ferroelectric state. The work highlights the importance of immiscibility in bismuth-based ferroelectric perovskite solid solutions and illustrates how their ferroelectric, piezoelectric, dielectric energy storage, ferromagnetic and magneto-electric properties can be tuned by consideration of the substitution mechanism and control of thermal processing parameters.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据