4.6 Article

Nickel metal-organic framework implanted on graphene and incubated to be ultrasmall nickel phosphide nanocrystals acts as a highly efficient water splitting electrocatalyst

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 6, 期 4, 页码 1682-1691

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7ta10218f

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21473254]
  2. Special Project Fund of Taishan Scholar of Shandong Province [ts201511017]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2017BB059]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [17CX02038A]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of low-cost, efficient, and stable electrocatalysts with bifunctional catalytic activity for overall water splitting is desirable but remains a great challenge. Here, a template-confinement strategy is presented with nickel metal-organic framework (MOF-74-Ni) implanted on graphene oxide and incubated by low temperature phosphorization to become ultrasmall nickel phosphide nanocrystals anchored on reduced graphene oxide (termed Ni2P/rGO). The size-controlled synthesis of ultrasmall metal-based catalysts is of vital economic interest and scientific importance for chemical conversion technologies. The Ni2P/rGO guarantees large active surface area and perfect dispersity of the active sites with ultrasmall particle sizes (average about 2.6 nm), which can serve as a highly efficient electrocatalyst for overall water splitting. In 1.0 M KOH, the Ni2P/rGO exhibited remarkable electrocatalytic performance for both HER and OER, affording a current density of 10 mA cm(-2) at overpotentials of 142 mV for HER and 260 mV for OER with small Tafel slope. Furthermore, an electrolyzer employed with Ni2P/rGO as a bifunctional catalyst in both the cathode and anode in 1.0 M KOH generated 10 mA cm(-2) at a voltage of 1.61 V with excellent stability, comparable to the integrated Pt/C and RuO2 counterparts, which is among the best performances of transition metal phosphides (TMPs).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据