4.6 Article

Significantly optimized thermoelectric properties in high-symmetry cubic Cu7PSe6 compounds via entropy engineering

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 6, 期 15, 页码 6493-6502

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8ta00631h

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [51472262, 51625205]
  2. Key Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences [KFZD-SW-421]
  3. International S&T Cooperation Program of China [2015DFA51050]
  4. Shanghai Government [15JC1400301]
  5. Youth Innovation Promotion Association, CAS [2016232]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

High-symmetry crystal structures are preferred for thermoelectrics because high structural symmetry usually yields good electron transport properties. Entropy engineering is an effective approach to improve the structural symmetry of low-symmetry materials, and thus to enhance their thermoelectric performance. In this study, via introducing Te into the argyrodite-type compound Cu7PSe6, the configurational entropy is significantly increased to successfully improve its initial low-symmetry cubic structure (P2(1)3) to the high-symmetry cubic structure (F (4) over bar 3m)at room temperature. Such improved structural symmetry leads to a high density-of-state effective mass but similar carrier mobility in the same carrier concentration range as compared with the pristine Cu7PSe6. Thus, significantly optimized electron transport properties are achieved in the Te-alloyed Cu7PSe6 samples. In particular, at room temperature, the power factor of the high-symmetry cubic Cu7PSe5.7Te0.3 sample is about 15-times higher than that of the low-symmetry Cu7PSe6 matrix. Combining the well-maintained ultralow lattice thermal conductivity, a maximum ZT of around 0.55 at 600 K is obtained in Cu7PSe5.7Te0.3. This work strongly shows that entropy engineering using multiple components is a very powerful strategy to discover or design novel high-performance TE materials starting from low-symmetry compounds.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据