4.6 Article

Designed synthesis of NiCo-LDH and derived sulfide on heteroatom-doped edge-enriched 3D rivet graphene films for high-performance asymmetric supercapacitor and efficient OER

期刊

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
卷 6, 期 17, 页码 8109-8119

出版社

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c8ta01832d

关键词

-

资金

  1. Science and Technology Support Program of Tianjin [16ZXCLGX00110]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51472177, 11474216, 51272173]
  3. State Key Program of National Natural Science of China [51531004]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nowadays, robustly coupling electroactive inorganics with bicontinuous graphene- based films is highly desirable for high-performance energy storage devices and electrocatalysts. Herein, free-standing heteroatom-doped edge-enriched 3D rivet graphene (H-3DRG) film with high flexibility and conductivity was obtained as a substrate to deposit vertically arranged NiCo-layered double hydroxide (NiCo-LDH) nanoneedles via a hydrothermal approach and hierarchical NiCo2S4 nanostructures by further in situ anion exchange process without destroying the original vertical architecture. The carbon nanoparticles located on the surface of bicontinuous 3D porous graphene show gradient and edge-enriched structure, which can provide much more nucleation sites and better attachment of electroactive inorganics than traditional 3D porous graphene films with interconnected carbon layers prepared by the chemical vapor deposition process. Such outstanding structural advantages accelerate the reaction kinetics and enhance electrochemical activities which mean that H-3DRG@NiCo-LDH- and H-3DRG@NiCo2S4-based asymmetric supercapacitor devices both show high energy densities of 39.4 W h kg(-1) and 37.6 W h kg(-1) based on the entire devices, respectively. Furthermore, these hybrids also favor the oxygen evolution reaction process, which deliver a mass oxygen production current density of 10 mA cm(-2) at low overpotentials of 289 and 264 mV in 1 M KOH, respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据