4.7 Article

Learning Consistent Feature Representation for Cross-Modal Multimedia Retrieval

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MULTIMEDIA
卷 17, 期 3, 页码 370-381

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TMM.2015.2390499

关键词

Cross-modal matching; documents and images; multimedia; retrieval

资金

  1. National Basic Research Program of China [2012CB316304]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61272331, 91338202, 61203267, 91438105]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The cross-modal feature matching has gained much attention in recent years, which has many practical applications, such as the text-to-image retrieval. The most difficult problem of cross-modal matching is how to eliminate the heterogeneity between modalities. The existing methods (e.g., CCA and PLS) try to learn a common latent subspace, where the heterogeneity between two modalities is minimized so that cross-matching is possible. However, most of these methods require fully paired samples and suffer difficulties when dealing with unpaired data. Besides, utilizing the class label information has been found as a good way to reduce the semantic gap between the low-level image features and high-level document descriptions. Considering this, we propose a novel and effective supervised algorithm, which can also deal with the unpaired data. In the proposed formulation, the basis matrices of different modalities are jointly learned based on the training samples. Moreover, a local group-based priori is proposed in the formulation to make a better use of popular block based features (e.g., HOG and GIST). Extensive experiments are conducted on four public databases: Pascal VOC2007, LabelMe, Wikipedia, and NUS-WIDE. We also evaluated the proposed algorithm with unpaired data. By comparing with existing state-of-the-art algorithms, the results show that the proposed algorithm is more robust and achieves the best performance, which outperforms the second best algorithm by about 5% on both the Pascal VOC2007 and NUS-WIDE databases.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据