4.7 Review

From individual cell motility to collective behaviors: insights from a prokaryote, Myxococcus xanthus

期刊

FEMS MICROBIOLOGY REVIEWS
卷 36, 期 1, 页码 149-164

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00307.x

关键词

focal adhesion; cytoskeleton; cell polarity; chemotaxis; multicellular development

资金

  1. China Scholarship Council [2008622014]
  2. Human Frontier Science Program [RGY0075/2008]
  3. Division Of Physics
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [844466] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In bird flocks, fish schools, and many other living organisms, regrouping among individuals of the same kin is frequently an advantageous strategy to survive, forage, and face predators. However, these behaviors are costly because the community must develop regulatory mechanisms to coordinate and adapt its response to rapid environmental changes. In principle, these regulatory mechanisms, involving communication between individuals, may also apply to cellular systems which must respond collectively during multicellular development. Dissecting the mechanisms at work requires amenable experimental systems, for example, developing bacteria. Myxococcus xanthus, a Gram-negative delatproteobacterium, is able to coordinate its motility in space and time to swarm, predate, and grow millimeter-size spore-filled fruiting bodies. A thorough understanding of the regulatory mechanisms first requires studying how individual cells move across solid surfaces and control their direction of movement, which was recently boosted by new cell biology techniques. In this review, we describe current molecular knowledge of the motility mechanism and its regulation as a lead-in to discuss how multicellular cooperation may have emerged from several layers of regulation: chemotaxis, cellcell signaling, and the extracellular matrix. We suggest that Myxococcus is a powerful system to investigate collective principles that may also be relevant to other cellular systems.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据