4.4 Article

Higgs boson pair production at NNLO with top quark mass effects

期刊

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
卷 -, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP05(2018)059

关键词

NLO Computations; QCD Phenomenology

资金

  1. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [CRSII2-141847, 200021-156585]
  2. Research Executive Agency (REA) of the European Union [PITN-GA-2012-316704]
  3. STFC [ST/P001246/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We consider QCD radiative corrections to Higgs boson pair production through gluon fusion in proton collisions. We combine the exact next-to-leading order (NLO) contribution, which features two-loop virtual amplitudes with the full dependence on the top quark mass M-t, with the next-to-next-to-leading order (NNLO) corrections computed in the large-M-t approximation. The latter are improved with different reweighting techniques in order to account for finite-M-t effects beyond NLO. Our reference NNLO result is obtained by combining one-loop double-real corrections with full M-t dependence with suitably reweighted real-virtual and double-virtual contributions evaluated in the large-M-t approximation. We present predictions for inclusive cross sections in pp collisions at root S = 13, 14, 27 and 100 TeV and we discuss their uncertainties due to missing M(t)effects. Our approximated NNLO corrections increase the NLO result by an amount ranging from +12% at A root S = 13 TeV to +7% at root S = 100 TeV, and the residual uncertainty of the inclusive cross section from missing M t effects is estimated to be at the few percent level. Our calculation is fully differential in the Higgs boson pair and the associated jet activity: we also present predictions for various differential distributions at A root S = 14 and 100 TeV, and discuss the size of the missing M-t effects, which can be larger, especially in the tails of certain observables. Our results represent the most advanced perturbative prediction available to date for this process.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据