4.4 Article

The 3d stress-tensor bootstrap

期刊

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
卷 -, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP02(2018)164

关键词

Conformal Field Theory; AdS-CFT Correspondence; Conformal and W Symmetry; Field Theories in Higher Dimensions

资金

  1. NSF [PHY-1720374, PHY-1350180]
  2. DOE [DE-SC0009988, DE-SC0011632]
  3. William D. Loughlin Membership at the Institute for Advanced Study
  4. Simons Foundation [488657, 488651]
  5. Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  6. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  7. Division Of Physics [1350180] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We study the conformal bootstrap for 4-point functions of stress tensors in parity-preserving 3d CFTs. To set up the bootstrap equations, we analyze the constraints of conformal symmetry, permutation symmetry, and conservation on the stress-tensor 4-point function and identify a non-redundant set of crossing equations. Studying these equations numerically using semidefinite optimization, we compute bounds on the central charge as a function of the independent coefficient in the stress-tensor 3-point function. With no additional assumptions, these bounds numerically reproduce the conformal collider bounds and give a general lower bound on the central charge. We also study the effect of gaps in the scalar, spin-2, and spin-4 spectra on the central charge bound. We find general upper bounds on these gaps as well as tighter restrictions on the stress-tensor 3-point function coefficients for theories with moderate gaps. When the gap for the leading scalar or spin-2 operator is sufficiently large to exclude large N theories, we also obtain upper bounds on the central charge, thus finding compact allowed regions. Finally, assuming the known low-lying spectrum and central charge of the critical 3d Ising model, we determine its stress-tensor 3-point function and derive a bound on its leading parity-odd scalar.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据