4.6 Review

Recent theoretical progress in the development of perovskite photovoltaic materials

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENERGY CHEMISTRY
卷 27, 期 3, 页码 637-649

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jechem.2017.10.010

关键词

Solar cells; Perovskite materials; Density functional theory

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21473183, 21303079]
  2. Foundation for Polish Science through the START program [42.2016]
  3. US National Science Foundation [CHE-1565704]
  4. US Department of Energy [DE-SC0014429]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Since the seminal work by Kojima et al. in 2009, solar cells based on hybrid organic-inorganic perovskites have attracted considerable attention and experienced an exponential growth, with photovoltaic efficiencies as of today reaching above 22%. Despite such an impressive development, some key scientific issues of these materials, including the presence of toxic lead, the poor long-term device stability under heat and humidity conditions, and the anomalous hysteresis of the current-voltage curves shown by various solar cell devices, still remain unsolved and constitute an important focus of experimental and theoretical researchers throughout the world. Density functional theory calculations have been successfully applied to exploring structural and electronic properties of semiconductors, complementing the experimental results in search and discovery of novel functional materials. In this review, we summarize the current progress in perovskite photovoltaic materials from a theoretical perspective. We discuss design of lead-free perovskite materials, humidity-induced degradation mechanisms and possible origins for the observed solar cell hysteresis, and assess future research directions for advanced perovskite solar cells based on computational materials design and theoretical understanding of intrinsic properties. (C) 2017 Science Press and Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. and Science Press. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据