4.6 Review

Recent advances of flexible perovskite solar cells

期刊

JOURNAL OF ENERGY CHEMISTRY
卷 27, 期 3, 页码 673-689

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jechem.2018.01.003

关键词

Perovskite solar cell; Flexible solar cell; Low-temperature process; Roll-to-roll manufacture; Thin film encapsulation

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51672094, 51661135023]
  2. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFC0205002]
  3. Self-determined and Innovative Research Funds of HUST [2016JCTD111]
  4. open research funds of Engineering Research Center of Nano-Geo Materials of Ministry of Education, China University of Geosciences [NGM2017KF013]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In few years only, the efficiency record of perovskite solar cells (PSCs) has raised quickly from 3.8% to over 22%. This emerging photovoltaic technology has primarily shown its great potential of industrialization. Flexible PSCs are thought to be one of the most priority options for mass production, related to the intrinsic advantage of perovskite thin films which could be deposited by facile solution processes at low temperature. Flexible PSCs have at least four advantages in comparison to the rigid counterpart: (1) it can generate higher power output at lighter weight, (2) it is easily portable, (3) it can be easily attached to architectures or textiles with diverse shapes, and (4) it is compatible with roll-to-roll fabrication in a large scale. In this review, we have summarized recent development of the key materials and technologies applied in flexible PSCs. The key materials including flexible substrates, transparent and conductive electrodes, and interfacial materials; some key technologies about roll-to-roll manufacture, encapsulation technology have been overviewed. Finally, a prospect on possible application directions of flexible PSCs has been discussed. (C) 2018 Science Press and Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Published by Elsevier B.V. and Science Press. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据