4.5 Article

Preoperative Antisepsis With Povidone-Iodine 5% in Cataract Surgery

期刊

ASIA-PACIFIC JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY
卷 1, 期 2, 页码 77-83

出版社

ASIA-PACIFIC ACAD OPHTHALMOLOGY-APAO
DOI: 10.1097/APO.0b013e31823e4c1e

关键词

povidone-iodine; antisepsis; cataract surgery; endophthalmitis

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of povidone-iodine (PI) 5% as the only preoperative antiseptic in cataract surgery. Design: Prospective interventional case series. Methods: Fifty patients undergoing phacoemulsification under topical anesthesia in an outpatient surgery setting in a teaching hospital participated in the study. The preoperative antiseptic regimen consisted of instillation into the conjunctival sac and periorbital scrub with PI 5%. No topical antibiotic was given. Eyelid margin swabs were obtained for bacteriological culture before and after PI antisepsis and at the conclusion of surgery. The number of bacterial species isolated was compared with the Wilcoxon test. Anterior chamber aspirates were taken immediately before and after surgery to determine the rate of contamination. Results: Bacteria were isolated from the eyelid margins of 48 patients (96%; 95% exact confidence interval, 86.3%-99.5%) before surgery, from the eyelid margins of 28 patients (56%) after antisepsis with PI 5%, and from the eyelid margins of 26 patients (56%; 95% exact confidence interval, 41.3%-70.0%) at the conclusion of surgery. The reduction of positive eyelid margin culturewas statistically significant (P < 0.0001). Anterior chamber aspirates were positive in 3 patients. One patient with negative growth from anterior chamber aspirates developed culture-negative postoperative endophthalmitis. Conclusions: Because 56% of eyelids still have positive culture after PI 5% antisepsis, it might not be relied on as the sole preoperative antiseptic measure. Meticulous surgical technique, together with other modalities of preoperative and intraoperative antisepsis, should be used to prevent postoperative endophthalmitis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据