4.2 Article Proceedings Paper

MethyMer: Design of combinations of specific primers for bisulfite sequencing of complete CpG islands

出版社

IMPERIAL COLLEGE PRESS
DOI: 10.1142/S0219720018400048

关键词

DNA methylation; primer design; bisulfite sequencing; CpG islands; cancer

资金

  1. Russian Foundation for Basic Research [15-04-08731, 15-34-70055]
  2. Moscow City Government

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present MethyMer, a Python-based tool aimed at selecting primers for amplification of complete CpG islands. These regions are difficult in terms of selecting appropriate primers because of their low-complexity, high GC content. Moreover, bisulfite treatment, in fact, leads to the reduction of the 4-letter alphabet (ATGC) to 3-letter one (ATG, except for methylated cytosines), and this also reduces region complexity and increases mispriming potential. MethyMer has a flexible scoring system, which optimizes the balance between various characteristics such as nucleotide composition, thermodynamic features (melting temperature, dimers Delta G, etc.), the presence of CpG sites and polyN tracts, and primer specificity, which is. assessed with aligning primers to the bisulfite-treated genome using bowtie (up to three mismatches are allowed). Users are able to customize desired or limit ranges of various parameters as well as penalties for non-desired values. Moreover, MethyMer allows picking up the optimal combination of PCR primer pairs to perform the amplification of a large genomic locus, e.g. CpG island or other hard-to-study region, with minimal overlap of the individual amplicons. MethyMer incorporates ENCODE genome annotation records (promoter/enhancer/insulator), The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) CpG methylation data derived with Illumina Infinium 450K microarrays, and records on correlations between TCGA RNA-Seq and CpG methylation data for 20 cancer types. These databases are included in the MethyMer release. Our tool is available at https://sourceforge.net/projects/methymer/.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据