4.5 Article

Sustainable Improvement of Clays Using Low-Carbon Nontraditional Additive

期刊

出版社

ASCE-AMER SOC CIVIL ENGINEERS
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001086

关键词

Soil improvement; Nontraditional additives; Clay; Sustainable treatment; Shear strength; Microstructure; Low carbon additive

资金

  1. Ministry of Higher Education Malaysia
  2. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM) [Q.J130000.2522.13H85]
  3. Thailand Research Fund under the TRF Senior Research Scholar program [RTA5980005]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nontraditional low-carbon additives are widely used in the sustainable treatment of problematic soils for construction and pavement materials. This study investigated the mechanical and microstructural properties of white kaolin (low strength clay) and green bentonite (high swelling clay) treated with a low-carbon sodium silicate-based liquid additive. The mechanical tests included unconfined compressive strength (UCS), direct shear and one-dimensional compression tests. Microscale assessments, including a field emission scanning electron microscopic (FESEM) test, nitrogen-based Brunauer, Emmett, and Teller (N-2-BET) surface area analysis and particle size analysis (PSA), were performed on the treated specimens to investigate the modification of soil structure, including soil fabric and interparticle forces. The performance of the proposed additive is demonstrated by the improvement of shear strength and compressibility of both tested soils. The optimum additive content was found to be 6%, and a significant improvement occurred in the first 7days of curing. The mechanical property improvement is attributed to the formation of cementitious products and, subsequently, the modification of the soil structure. These cementitious products filled the pores and bonded the soil particles, resulting in an increase in interparticle forces. The sodium silicate-based additive can offer a low-carbon alternative to traditional additives such as cement and lime, which is significant from the engineering and environmental perspectives.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据