4.7 Article

Data-Driven Correction Approach to Refine Power Curve of Wind Farm Under Wind Curtailment

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY
卷 9, 期 1, 页码 95-105

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TSTE.2017.2717021

关键词

Outlier elimination; power curve; wind curtailment; wind farm modeling; wind power

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51477174, 51677188, 51711530227]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFB0902200]
  3. Project of State Grids Corporation of China [5201011600TS]
  4. Open Fund of State Key Laboratory of Operation and Control of Renewable Energy and Storage Systems

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Regardless of the rapid development of wind power capacity installation around the world, wind curtailment is a severe problem to be solved. Wind curtailment can cause abundant outliers and change the original characteristics of operation data in wind farms. Power curve cannot be accurately modeled with these outliers and consequently wind power forecasting as well as other applications in power system will be negatively affected. In this paper, the characteristics of the outliers caused by wind curtailment are analyzed. Then, a data-driven outlier elimination approach combining quartile method and density-based clustering method is proposed. First, the quartile method is used twice for eliminating sparse outliers. Then density-based spatial clustering of applications with noise method is applied to eliminate stacked outliers. A case study is carried out by modeling the power curves of a wind farm and 20 wind turbines in this wind farm. The accuracy of power curve modeling is significantly improved and the elimination procedure can be completed in a very short time, indicating that the proposed methods are effective and efficient for eliminating outliers. The performance of the methods is insensitive to their parameters and can be directly used in different cases without tuning parameters, both for wind turbines and wind farms.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据