4.7 Article

Dispatch Model for CHP With Pipeline and Building Thermal Energy Storage Considering Heat Transfer Process

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 192-203

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TSTE.2018.2829536

关键词

Building; combined heat and power (CHP); district heating network (DHN); flexibility; heat transfer (HT) process; power dispatch; thermal energy storage (TES)

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFB0902100]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51377002]
  3. State Grid Corporation of China [SGTJ0000KXJS1500072]
  4. U.K.-China Joint Research and Innovation Partnership Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Utilizing the flexibility provided by the thermal system components, for example, pipelines in the district heating network (DHN), building envelopes as well as thermal energy storage (TES) devices, can be an effective way for power system to solve the wind curtailment problem which closely relates to the limited flexibility of combined heat and power. However, almost all the previous studies ignored heat transfer (HT) constraints when modeling these abovementioned thermal system components. An HT constraint is one of the most important constraints in thermal system analysis, without considering it may result in infeasibility for the dispatch results. Hence, in this study, we propose a detailed model for these three components, namely DHN, building envelopes, and TES devices, with consideration of HT constraints. This model can be further simplified to consider different combinations of these components by setting relevant model parameters. An iteration solution to deal with such nonlinear HT constraints is put forward. The effectiveness of the proposed model is verified by case studies. The simulation results demonstrate that considering HT constraints is necessary when try to exploit the flexibility provided by these thermal system components, or we may overestimate their benefit.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据