4.7 Article

Duality-Free Decomposition Based Data-Driven Stochastic Security-Constrained Unit Commitment

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY
卷 10, 期 1, 页码 82-93

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TSTE.2018.2825361

关键词

Data-driven stochastic optimization; duality-free decomposition; security-constrained unit commitment; distributionally robust optimization

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFB0901900]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51607137]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017T100748]
  4. Project of State Key Laboratory of Electrical Insulation
  5. Power Equipment in Xi'an Jiaotong University [EIPE16301]
  6. U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory [DE-AC52-07NA27344, LLNL-JRNL-749680]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

To incorporate the superiority of both stochastic and robust approaches, a data-driven stochastic optimization is employed to solve the security-constrained unit commitment model. This approach makes themost use of the historical data to generate a set of possible probability distributions for wind power outputs and then it optimizes the unit commitment under the worst-case probability distribution. However, this model suffers from huge computational burden, as a large number of scenarios are considered. To tackle this issue, a duality-free decomposition method is proposed in this paper. This approach does not require doing duality, which can save a large set of dual variables and constraints, and therefore reduces the computational burden. In addition, the inner max-min problem has a special mathematical structure, where the scenarios have the similar constraint. Thus, the max-min problem can be decomposed into independent subproblems to be solved in parallel, which further improves the computational efficiency. A numerical study on an IEEE 118-bus system with practical data of a wind power system has demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposal.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据