4.7 Article

Lightweight Authentication and Key Agreement for Smart Metering in Smart Energy Networks

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID
卷 10, 期 4, 页码 4349-4359

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TSG.2018.2857558

关键词

Authentication; key agreement; smart metering infrastructure; smart energy networks

资金

  1. U.K. EPSRC (Security and Privacy in Smart Grid Systems: Countermeasure and Formal Verification) [EP/N020170/1]
  2. Center for Industrial Informatics
  3. Research Council of Norway through PREAPP Project [231746/F20]
  4. Research Council of Norway through eX3 Project [270053]
  5. EPSRC [EP/N020170/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Smart meters (SMs) are considered as foundational part of the smart metering infrastructure (SMI) in smart energy networks (SENs). SM is a digital device that makes use of two-way communication between consumer and utility to exchange, manage and control energy consumptions within a home. However, despite all the features, an SM raises several security-related concerns. For instance, how to exchange data between the legal entities (e.g., SM and utility server) while maintaining privacy of the consumer. To address these concerns, authentication and key agreement in SMI can provide important security properties that not only to maintain a trust between the legitimate entities but also to satisfy other security services. This work presents a lightweight authentication and key agreement that enables trust, anonymity, integrity and adequate security in the domain of SEN. The proposed scheme employs hybrid cryptography to facilitate mutual trust (authentication), dynamic session key, integrity, and anonymity. We justify the feasibility of the proposed scheme with a test-bed using 802.15.4 based device (i.e., SM). Moreover, through the security and performance analysis, we show that the proposed scheme is more effective and energy efficient compared to the previous schemes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据