4.7 Article

A Multi-Functional Fully Distributed Control Framework for AC Microgrids

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID
卷 9, 期 4, 页码 3247-3258

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TSG.2016.2628785

关键词

AC microgrid; cooperative control; distributed control; droop control; inverters; secondary control

资金

  1. National Science Foundation [ECCS-1405173]
  2. U.S. Office of Naval Research [N00014-14-1-0718]
  3. Directorate For Engineering [1405173] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper proposes a fully distributed control methodology for secondary control of ac microgrids. The control framework includes three modules: 1) voltage regulator; 2) reactive power regulator; and 3) active power/frequency regulator. The voltage regulator module maintains the average voltage of the microgrid distribution line at the rated value. The reactive power regulator compares the local normalized reactive power of an inverter with its neighbors' powers on a communication graph and, accordingly, fine-tunes Q-V droop coefficients to mitigate any reactive power mismatch. Collectively, these two modules account for the effect of the distribution line impedance on the reactive power flow. The third module regulates all inverter frequencies at the nominal value while sharing the active power demand among them. Unlike most conventional methods, this controller does not utilize any explicit frequency measurement. The proposed controller is fully distributed; i.e., each controller requires information exchange with only its neighbors linked directly on the communication graph. Steady-state performance analysis assures the global voltage regulation, frequency synchronization, and proportional active/reactive power sharing. An ac microgrid is prototyped to experimentally validate the proposed control methodology against the load change, plug-and-play operation, and communication constraints such as delay, packet loss, and limited bandwidth.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据