4.7 Article

Novel Linearized Power Flow and Linearized OPF Models for Active Distribution Networks With Application in Distribution LMP

期刊

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID
卷 9, 期 1, 页码 438-448

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TSG.2016.2594814

关键词

Distributed generation; active distribution network (ADN); linearized optimal power flow for distribution (LOPF-D); linearized power flow for distribution (LPF-D); locational marginal pricing (LMP); loss factor for distribution (LF-D)

资金

  1. NSF [ECCS-1001999]
  2. Engineering Research Center Shared Facilities through CURENT
  3. NSF/DOE Engineering Research Center [EEC-1041877]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The locational marginal price (LMP) methodology has been discussed for distribution networks/systems under the smart grid initiative. In this paper, a new distribution LMP (DLMP) formulation is presented which includes reactive power prices and voltage constraints. To solve DLMP, three modeling tools, namely, linearized power flow for distribution (LPF-D), loss factors for distribution (LF-D), and linear optimal power flow for distribution (LOPF-D) are proposed. LPF-D solves not only voltage angles but also magnitudes through linear expression between bus injections and bus voltages, specifically for distribution systems. LF-D is solved recursively based on the radial topology of typical distribution systems. With the integration of LPF-D and LF-D, conventional optimal power flow (OPF) can be reformulated as LOPF-D which is essentially a linear programming model. Test results on various systems show that: 1) LPF-D efficiently yields very close results if compared with AC power flow; 2) LOPF-D provides very close dispatch results in both real and reactive power if compared with ACOPF; and 3) the proposed DLMPs calculated with LF-D and LOPF-D give accurate price information if compared with the prices from ACOPF. Further, these three tools are not limited to DLMP but can be potentially applied to other distribution analyses.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据