4.6 Article

Sparse Group Representation Model for Motor Imagery EEG Classification

期刊

出版社

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/JBHI.2018.2832538

关键词

Brain-computer interface (BCI); electroencephalogram (EEG); motor imagery (MI); sparse group representation model (SGRM); common spatial pattern (CSP)

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91420302, 61573142, 61501164, 61703407]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [WH1516018, 222201717006]
  3. Programme of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities (the 111 Project) [B17017]
  4. Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation [14.756.31.0001]
  5. Polish National Science Center [2016/20/W/N24/00354]
  6. Foundation of Key Laboratory of Science and Technology for National Defense [6142222030301]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A potential limitation of a motor imagery (MI) based brain-computer interface (BCI) is that it usually requires a relatively long time to record sufficient electroencephalogram (EEG) data for robust classifier training. The calibration burden during data acquisition phase will most probably cause a subject to be reluctant to use a BCI system. To alleviate this issue, we propose a novel sparse group representation model (SGRM) for improving the efficiency of MI-based BCI by exploiting the intersubject information. Specifically, preceded by feature extraction using common spatial pattern, a composite dictionary matrix is constructed with training samples from both the target subject and other subjects. By explicitly exploiting within-group sparse and group-wise sparse constraints, the most compact representation of a test sample of the target subject is then estimated as a linear combination of columns in the dictionary matrix. Classification is implemented by calculating the classspecific representation residual based on the significant training samples corresponding to the nonzero representation coefficients. Accordingly, the proposed SGRM method effectively reduces the required training samples from the target subject due to auxiliary data available from other subjects. With two public EEG data sets, extensive experimental comparisons are carried out between SGRM and other stateof-the-art approaches. Superior classification performance of our method using 40 trials of the target subject for model calibration (Averaged accuracy = 78.2%, Kappa = 0.57 and Averaged accuracy = 77.7%, Kappa = 0.55 for the two data sets, respectively) indicates its promising potential for improving the practicality of MI-based BCI.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据