4.4 Article

Differential Expression of Histone H3.3 Genes and Their Role in Modulating Temperature Stress Response in Caenorhabditis elegans

期刊

GENETICS
卷 209, 期 2, 页码 551-565

出版社

GENETICS SOCIETY AMERICA
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.118.300909

关键词

Histone variants; H3.3; germ line; C. elegans; stress response; HIRA

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health Office of Research Infrastructure Programs [P40 OD-010440]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation [31003A_156774]
  3. Republic and Canton of Geneva
  4. Institute of Genetics and Genomics in Geneva (iGE3)
  5. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [31003A_156774] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Replication-independent variant histones replace canonical histones in nucleosomes and act as important regulators of chromatin function. H3.3 is a major variant of histone H3 that is remarkably conserved across taxa and is distinguished from canonical H3 by just four key amino acids. Most genomes contain two or more genes expressing H3.3, and complete loss of the protein usually causes sterility or embryonic lethality. Here, we investigate the developmental expression patterns of the five Caenorhabditis elegans H3.3 homologs and identify two previously uncharacterized homologs to be restricted to the germ line. Despite these specific expression patterns, we find that neither loss of individual H3.3 homologs nor the knockout of all five H3.3-coding genes causes sterility or lethality. However, we demonstrate an essential role for the conserved histone chaperone HIRA in the nucleosomal loading of all H3.3 variants. This requirement can be bypassed by mutation of the H3.3-specific residues to those found in H3. While even removal of all H3.3 homologs does not result in lethality, it leads to reduced fertility and viability in response to high-temperature stress. Thus, our results show that H3.3 is nonessential in C. elegans but is critical for ensuring adequate response to stress.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据