4.4 Article

RNA-Interference Pathways Display High Rates of Adaptive Protein Evolution in Multiple Invertebrates

期刊

GENETICS
卷 208, 期 4, 页码 1585-1599

出版社

GENETICS SOCIETY AMERICA
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.117.300567

关键词

adaptive evolution; antiviral immunity; population genetics; RNA interference; small RNA; transposable elements; viruses

资金

  1. Royal Society Research Fellowship [UF150696]
  2. Darwin Trust of Edinburgh
  3. Wellcome Trust [WT095831]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Conflict between organisms can lead to a reciprocal adaptation that manifests as an increased evolutionary rate in genes mediating the conflict. This adaptive signature has been observed in RNA-interference (RNAi) pathway genes involved in the suppression of viruses and transposable elements in Drosophila melanogaster, suggesting that a subset of Drosophila RNAi genes may be locked in an arms race with these parasites. However, it is not known whether rapid evolution of RNAi genes is a general phenomenon across invertebrates, or which RNAi genes generally evolve adaptively. Here we use population genomic data from eight invertebrate species to infer rates of adaptive sequence evolution, and to test for past and ongoing selective sweeps in RNAi genes. We assess rates of adaptive protein evolution across species using a formal meta-analytic framework to combine data across species and by implementing a multispecies generalized linear mixed model of mutation counts. Across species, we find that RNAi genes display a greater rate of adaptive protein substitution than other genes, and that this is primarily mediated by positive selection acting on the genes most likely to defend against viruses and transposable elements. In contrast, evidence for recent selective sweeps is broadly spread across functional classes of RNAi genes and differs substantially among species. Finally, we identify genes that exhibit elevated adaptive evolution across the analyzed insect species, perhaps due to concurrent parasite-mediated arms races.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据