4.7 Article

Identification and Mapping of the Clubroot Resistance Gene CRd in Chinese Cabbage (Brassica rapa ssp pekinensis)

期刊

FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE
卷 9, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00653

关键词

Chinese cabbage; Plasmodiophora brassicae; clubroot disease; bulked segregant analysis; pathogen resistance gene; CR cultivars

资金

  1. National Natural Scientific Foundation of China [31471882]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFD0100202-19]
  3. earmarked fund for China Agriculture Research System [CARS-12]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The rapid spread of clubroot disease, which is caused by Plasmodiophora brassicae, threatens Brassicaceae crop production worldwide. Breeding plants that have broad-spectrum disease resistance is one of the best ways to prevent clubroot. In the present study, eight Chinese cabbage germplasms were screened using published clubroot-resistant (CR) loci-/gene-linked markers. A CR gene Crr3 potential carrier 85-74 was detected which linked to marker BRSTS61; however, 85-74 shows different responses to local pathogens LAB-19, LNND-2, and LAB-10 from CR-73 which harbors Crr3. We used a next-generation sequencing-based bulked segregant analysis approach combined with genetic mapping to detect CR genes in an F2 segregant population generated from a cross between the Chinese cabbage inbred lines 85-74 (CR) and BJN3-1 (clubroot susceptible). The 85-74 line showed resistance to a local pathogen LAB-19 which was identified as race 4; a genetic analysis revealed that the resistance was conferred by a single dominant gene. The CR gene which we named CRd was mapped to a 60 kb (1 cM) region between markers yau389 and yau376 on chromosome A03. CRd is located upstream of Crr3 which was confirmed based on the physical positions of Crr3 linked markers. The identification of CRd linked markers can be applied to marker-assisted selection in the breeding of new CR cultivars of Chinese cabbage and other Brassica crops.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据