4.7 Article

Enterokinase Enhances Influenza A Virus Infection by Activating Trypsinogen in Human Cell Lines

出版社

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fcimb.2018.00091

关键词

enterokinase; influenza A virus; hemagglutinin processing; transmembrane serine protease; genome structure and function

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [24590555, 16K15319]
  2. Health Labor Sciences Research Grant from Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare [24170101]
  3. Cooperative Research Grant of the Institute for Enzyme Research, Joint Usage/Research Center, The University of Tokushima

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cleavage and activation of hemagglutinin (HA) by trypsin-like proteases in influenza A virus (IAV) are essential prerequisites for its successful infection and spread. In host cells, some transmembrane serine proteases such as TMPRSS2, TMPRSS4 and HAT, along with plasmin in the bloodstream, have been reported to cleave the HA precursor (HA(0)) molecule into its active forms, HA(1) and HA(2). Some trypsinogens can also enhance IAV proliferation in some cell types (e.g., rat cardiomyoblasts). However, the precise activation mechanism for this process is unclear, because the expression level of the physiological activator of the trypsinogens, the TMPRSS15 enterokinase, is expected to be very low in such cells, with the exception of duodenal cells. Here, we show that at least two variant enterokinases are expressed in various human cell lines, including A549 lung-derived cells. The exogenous expression of these enterokinases was able to enhance the proliferation of IAV in 293T human kidney cells, but the proliferation was reduced by knocking down the endogenous enterokinase in A549 cells. The enterokinase was able to enhance HA processing in the cells, which activated trypsinogen in vitro and in the IAV-infected cells also. Therefore, we conclude that enterokinase plays a role in IAV infection and proliferation by activating trypsinogen to process viral HA in human cell lines.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据