4.6 Article

Dual CRISPR-Cas9 Cleavage Mediated Gene Excision and Targeted Integration in Yarrowia lipolytica

期刊

BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL
卷 13, 期 9, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/biot.201700590

关键词

CRISPR-Cas9; gene excision; homologous recombination; homology mediated end joining; targeted integration; Yarrowia lipolytica

资金

  1. NSF [CBET-1403099, 1706134]
  2. Early Career Faculty grant from NASA's Space Technology Research Grants Program
  3. Directorate For Engineering
  4. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [1706134] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CRISPR-Cas9 technology has been successfully applied in Yarrowia lipolytica for targeted genomic editing including gene disruption and integration; however, disruptions by existing methods typically result from small frameshift mutations caused by indels within the coding region, which usually resulted in unnatural protein. In this study, a dual cleavage strategy directed by paired sgRNAs is developed for gene knockout. This method allows fast and robust gene excision, demonstrated on six genes of interest. The targeted regions for excision vary in length from 0.3kb up to 3.5kb and contain both non-coding and coding regions. The majority of the gene excisions are repaired by perfect nonhomologous end-joining without indel. Based on this dual cleavage system, two targeted markerless integration methods are developed by providing repair templates. While both strategies are effective, homology mediated end joining (HMEJ) based method are twice as efficient as homology recombination (HR) based method. In both cases, dual cleavage leads to similar or improved gene integration efficiencies compared to gene excision without integration. This dual cleavage strategy will be useful for not only generating more predictable and robust gene knockout, but also for efficient targeted markerless integration, and simultaneous knockout and integration in Y. lipolytica.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据