4.2 Article

Experimental Study on Productivity Performance of Household Combined Thermal Power an Biogas System in Northwest China

期刊

BIOMED RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL
卷 2018, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

HINDAWI LTD
DOI: 10.1155/2018/7420656

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51676094]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of China [51706128]
  3. International S&T Cooperation Projects of Gansu Province [1604WKCA009]
  4. Shanxi Provincial Education Department [17JS018]
  5. Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province [1508RJYA097]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ample quantities of solar and local biomass energy are available in the rural regions of northwest China to satisfy the energy needs of farmers. In this work, low-temperature solar thermal collectors, photovoltaic solar power generators, and solar-powered thermostatic biogas digesters were combined to create a heat, electricity, and biogas cogeneration system and were experimentally studied through two buildings in a farming village in northwestern China. The results indicated that the floor heater had the best heating effect. And the fraction of the energy produced by the solar elements of the system was 60.3%. The photovoltaic power-generation system achieved photovoltaic (PV) conversion efficiencies of 8.3% and 8.1% during the first and second season, respectively. The intrinsic power consumption of the system was 143.4 kW.h, and 115.7 kW.h of electrical power was generated by the system in each season. The average volume of biogas produced daily was approximately 1.0 m(3). Even though the ambient temperature reached -25 degrees C, the temperature of the biogas digester was maintained at 27 degrees C +/- 2 for thermostatic fermentation. After optimization, the energy-saving rate improved from 66.2% to 85.5%. The installation reduced CO2 emissions by approximately 27.03 t, and the static payback period was 3.1 yr. Therefore, the system is highly economical, energy efficient, and beneficial for the environment.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据