4.5 Article

Magnetic core mesoporous silica nanoparticles doped with dacarbazine and labelled with 99mTc for early and differential detection of metastatic melanoma by single photon emission computed tomography

期刊

ARTIFICIAL CELLS NANOMEDICINE AND BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 46, 期 -, 页码 S1080-S1087

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/21691401.2018.1443941

关键词

Nanoparticles; magnetic mesoporous silica; smart device; cancer; imaging

资金

  1. National Scientific and Technological Research Council (CNPQ)
  2. Rio de Janeiro State Research Foundation (FAPERJ)
  3. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [MAT2012-38429-C04-01]
  4. Generalitat Valenciana [PROMETEO/2009/016]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Cancer is responsible for more than 12% of all causes of death in the world, with an annual death rate of more than 7 million people. In this scenario melanoma is one of the most aggressive ones with serious limitation in early detection and therapy. In this direction we developed, characterized and tested in vivo a new drug delivery system based on magnetic core-mesoporous silica nanoparticle that has been doped with dacarbazine and labelled with technetium 99m to be used as nano-imaging agent (nanoradiopharmaceutical) for early and differential diagnosis and melanoma by single photon emission computed tomography. The results demonstrated the ability of the magnetic core-mesoporous silica to be efficiently (>98%) doped with dacarbazine and also efficiently labelled with 99mTc (technetium 99m) (>99%). The in vivo test, using inducted mice with melanoma, demonstrated the EPR effect of the magnetic core-mesoporous silica nanoparticles doped with dacarbazine and labelled with technetium 99 metastable when injected intratumorally and the possibility to be used as systemic injection too. In both cases, magnetic core-mesoporous silica nanoparticles doped with dacarbazine and labelled with technetium 99 metastable showed to be a reliable and efficient nano-imaging agent for melanoma. [GRAPHICS]

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据