3.8 Article

Meta-Analysis of Studies Analyzing the Role of Human Papillomavirus in the Development of Bladder Carcinoma

期刊

KOREAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
卷 53, 期 4, 页码 240-247

出版社

KOREAN UROLOGICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.4111/kju.2012.53.4.240

关键词

Human papillomavirus; Infection; Meta-analysis; Urinary bladder neoplasms; Viruses

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Purpose: We aimed to ascertain the degree of association between bladder cancer and human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. Materials and Methods: We performed a meta-analysis of observational studies with cases and controls with publication dates up to January 2011. The PubMed electronic database was searched by using the key words bladder cancer and virus. Twenty-one articles were selected that met the required methodological criteria. We implemented an internal quality control system to verify the selected search method. We analyzed the pooled effect of all the studies and also analyzed the techniques used as follows: 1) studies with DNA-based techniques, among which we found studies with polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based techniques and 2) studies with non-PCR-based techniques, and studies with non-DNA-based techniques. Results: Taking into account the 21 studies that were included in the meta-analysis, we obtained a heterogeneity chi-squared value of Qexp=26.45 (p=0.383). The pooled odds ratio (OR) was 2.13 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.54 to 2.95), which points to a significant effect between HPV and bladder cancer. Twenty studies assessed the presence of DNA. The overall effect showed a significant relationship between virus presence and bladder cancer, with a pooled OR of 2.19 (95% CI, 1.40 to 3.43). Of the other six studies, four examined the virus's capsid antigen and two detected antibodies in serum by Western blot. The estimated pooled OR in this group was 2.11 (95% CI, 1.27 to 3.51), which confirmed the relationship between the presence of virus and cancer. Conclusions: The pooled OR value showed a moderate relationship between viral infection and bladder tumors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据