4.7 Article

Quantification of heterotrophic bacteria during the growth of Synechocystis sp PCC 6803 using fluorescence activated cell sorting and microscopy

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.algal.2018.01.006

关键词

Heterotrophic bacteria; Quantification; Synechocystis sp PCC 6803; Flow cytometry; Cyanobacteria

资金

  1. LightWorks
  2. Arizona State University
  3. China Scholarship Council [201506260022]
  4. National Science Foundation of China [51678422, 51378368]
  5. National Key Project of Research and Development Plan of China [2017YFC0403400]
  6. Shanghai Institute of Pollution Control and Ecological Security
  7. Shanghai Tongji Gao Tingyao Environmental Science & Technology Development Foundation
  8. School of Life Sciences at Arizona State University [PCC6803]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The presence of heterotrophic bacteria in microalgal cultures can dilute the microalgal content of the harvested biomass, compete for nutrients, and be associated with culture crashes. Being able to detect and quantify heterotrophic bacteria would be of high value for monitoring culture health and reducing deleterious effects. Here, we developed and applied a new method that combines flow cytometry (FC) and fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) for the quantification of heterotrophic bacteria in cultures of the cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803. Particles not containing chlorophyll - heterotrophic bacteria and cell debris - were separated from mixed cultures using FACS based on autofluorescence of Synechocystis. Heterotrophic bacteria were differentiated from cell debris using FC with SYTOX green fluorescence. Using microscopy, we verified that FACS was able to quantify heterotrophic bacteria in Synechocystis cultures effectively. Applying these methods to batch cultures of Synechocystis showed that the count proportions of heterotrophic bacteria were significant (3-13%) and that depletion of inorganic P in the culture favored Synechocystis over heterotrophic bacteria, but led to more cell lysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据