4.6 Article

Gas-Exfoliation Assisted Fabrication of Porous Graphene Nanosheets Derived from Plumeria rubra for Highly Efficient Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 6, 期 9, 页码 11536-11546

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b01723

关键词

Biomass; Plumeria rubra; Graphene nanosheets; Hydrogen evolution

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21571064, 21371060]
  2. PhD Start-up Fund of Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities

向作者/读者索取更多资源

An environmentally friendly strategy was performed to prepare porous graphene nanosheets (PGS) through gas-exfoliation assisted KOH activation by using Plumeria rubra as the precursor for the first time. Because the synergistic reaction of various graphitization temperature and activating agent amounts, the precursor was gradually exfoliated by released gases, graphitizing at high temperatures and forming porous graphene nanosheets during the graphitization. PGS-2-1000 with a hierarchical porous structure possessed high graphitization (I-D/I-G = 0.77, I-2D/I-G = 0.53), ultrahigh specific surface (1581 m(2) g(-1)) and large pore volume (0.916 cm(3) g(-1)). A facile in situ photoreduction treatment was utilized to form a Cu/PGS photocatalyst composed of nonsemiconductor plasmonic Cu NPs and porous graphene nanosheets, exhibiting the hydrogen evolution rate of 4.87 mmol g(-1) h(-1), which is 4-fold as high as that of single Cu NPs. The photostability of Cu/PGS-2-1000 was investigated in five consecutive runs of 30 h accumulative irradiation. The PGS could act as an electron transport bridge to boost the separation of electron-hole pairs and the uniform distribution of Cu NPs, even serve as a photocatalyst for hydrogen generation. Furthermore, a possible mechanism was proposed to illustrate the circumstantial charge transfer channel as well as the improvement of photocatalytic activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据