4.6 Article

The meaning of the blood urea nitrogen/creatinine ratio in acute kidney injury

期刊

CLINICAL KIDNEY JOURNAL
卷 5, 期 2, 页码 187-191

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfs013

关键词

acute kidney injury; acute tubular necrosis; blood urea nitrogen; creatinine; pre-renal azotemia

资金

  1. Austin Hospital Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Trust Fund

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background. A blood urea nitrogen (BUN)/creatinine ratio (BCR) > 20 (0.081 in international unit) is used to distinguish pre-renal azotemia (PRA) and acute tubular necrosis (ATN). However, there is little evidence that BCR can distinguish between these two conditions and/or is clinically useful. Methods. We conducted a retrospective study using a large hospital database. Patients were divided into three groups: 'low BCR' (if BCR when acute kidney injury (AKI) developed was <= 20), 'high BCR' (if BCR when AKI developed was > 20) and 'no AKI' if patients did not satisfy any of the Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss and End-stage kidney disease criteria for AKI during hospitalization. Results. Among 20 126 study patients, 3641 (18.1%) had AKI. Among these patients, 1704 (46.8%) had a BCR < 20 at AKI diagnosis (` low BCR') and 1937 (53.2%) had a BCR > 20 (` high BCR'). The average BCR for the two groups was 15.8 versus 26.1 (P < 0.001). Hospital mortality was significantly less in the 'low-BCR' group (18.4 versus 29.9%, P < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis for hospital mortality (` no AKI' as a reference) showed that the odds ratio of 'high BCR' (5.73) was higher than that of 'low BCR' (3.32). Conclusions. Approximately half of the patients with AKI have a BCR > 20, the traditional threshold of diagnosing PRA. Unlike PRA patients who have a lower mortality than ATN patients, high BCR patients had higher hospital mortality compared with low BCR patients, which was confirmed with multivariable analysis. These findings do not support BCR as a marker of PRA.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据