4.6 Article

Catalytic Transfer Hydrogenolysis of Lignin-Derived Aromatic Ethers Promoted by Bimetallic Pd/Ni Systems

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 6, 期 7, 页码 9269-9276

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b01593

关键词

Catalytic transfer hydrogenolysis; Aromatic ethers; Heterogeneous catalysis; Nickel; Palladium; Bimetallic catalysts

资金

  1. RUDN University Program 5-100
  2. Mediterranea University of Reggio Calabria
  3. PON (ACQUASYSTEM project)
  4. PON (MEL project)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Catalytic transfer hydrogenolysis (CTH) of diphenyl ether (DPE), 2-phenethyl phenyl ether (PPE), and benzyl phenyl ether (BPE) as model molecules of alpha-O-4 and beta-O-4 as well as 4-O-5 lignin linkages promoted by bimetallic Pd/Ni systems is reported. Pd/Ni (Pd loading of 3 wt %) catalysts were synthesized by using a simple and economic coprecipitation technique, and its detailed physicochemical characterization was performed by means of H2-TPR, XRD, TEM, and XPS analysis. In the presence of palladium as cometal, an almost complete conversion of DPE was reached after 90 min at a temperature of 240 degrees C while BPE and PPE C-O bond breaking could be achieved at milder reaction conditions. Pd/Ni bimetallic systems can be magnetically recovered and efficiently used up to eight consecutive recycling tests in the transfer hydrogenolysis of DPE. The investigated substrates were also tested using analogous Ni monometallic systems. Palladium as cometal present in the catalysts was proven to increase the C-O bond cleavage rates and decrease aromatic ring hydrogenation selectivity. The catalytic tests on all possible reaction intermediates clearly show that the hydrogenolysis cleavage in etheric C-O bond breaking was the rate-determining step under CTH conditions, while hydrogenations only take place in a successive step. Moreover, it has been demonstrated that the hydrogenation of phenol formed from CTH depends on the type of aryl groups that form the aromatic ether structure.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据