4.6 Article

Direct Ethanol Fuel Cells with Superior Ethanol-Tolerant Nonprecious Metal Cathode Catalysts for Oxygen Reduction Reaction

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 6, 期 6, 页码 7609-+

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b00405

关键词

DEFC; Ethanol tolerance; Nonprecious metal catalyst; Oxygen reduction reaction; Doped carbon

资金

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education [NRF-2016R1A2B2016033]
  2. Technology Development Program to Solve Climate Changes of the National Research Foundation (NRF) - Ministry of Science, ICT [NRF-2017M1A2A2086648]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Direct ethanol fuel cells (DEFCs), which use ethanol as a fuel, have attracted considerable attention due to their relatively high energy density, the nontoxicity of ethanol, and the abundance of ethanol sources. However, since the crossover of ethanol as a fuel in DEFCs can deteriorate the cell performance due to the oxidation of ethanol (EtOH) at the cathode during oxygen reduction reaction (ORR), nonprecious metal (NPM) cathode catalysts for ORR have been studied using carbon-based nanostructures as promising alternatives to Pt-based catalysts. Herein, the doped carbon nanostructures (C/Fe-TMPP and C/Fe-Pc) as cathode catalysts were synthesized using a template method with iron(III) 5,10,15,20-(tetra-4-methoxyphenyl) porphyrin chloride (Fe-TMPP) and iron(II) phthalocyanine (Fe-Pc). In the half-cell test, C/Fe-TMPP exhibited an enhanced ORR activity in 0.5 M H2SO4 (i.e., high half-wave potential and specific current density) and maintained ORR performance in the presence of crossover ethanol, compared to a commercial Pt/C. Moreover, C/Fe-TMPP exhibited high performance in the DEFC supplied with high-concentrated EtOH as a fuel at the cathode. The excellent ORR activity of C/Fe-TMPP for the DEFC can be attributed to ethanol tolerance in the ORR and low ethanol adsorption energy of the active sites for the ORR of C/Fe-TMPP.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据