4.6 Article

Reduced Graphene Oxide-Supported MoP@P-Doped Porous Carbon Nano-octahedrons as High-Performance Electrocatalysts for Hydrogen Evolution

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 6, 期 8, 页码 10252-10259

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b01575

关键词

Hydrogen evolution reaction; Metal-organic frameworks; Molybdenum phosphide; Porous carbon; Reduced graphene oxide

资金

  1. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016M602178]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2014BQ037]
  3. Project of Shandong Province Higher Educational Science and Technology Program [J16LC02]
  4. Foundation of Basic Discipline Construction and Theoretical Research Center of Jining University [2017JCKK005]
  5. Talent Team Culturing Plan for Leading Disciplines of University in Shandong Province

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hydrogen as a clean and environmentally friendly energy carrier has attracted extensive interest. Although Pt-based materials have been considered as the state-of-the-art catalysts for the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), the high-cost and low-abundance hinder their practical application. Herein, we report the development of reduced graphene oxide (rGO) supported molybdenum phosphide (MoP) encapsulated in P-doped porous carbon (PC) nano-octahedrons derived from polyoxometalate-based metal organic frameworks (POMOFs) by carbonization and subsequent phosphidation process. Impressively, combining the advantages of MoP, PC, and rGO, the composite shows superior electrocatalytic HER performance and stability, with a low onset overpotential of 62.3 mV, small Tafel slope of 53.6 mV dec(-1), along with long-term durability for 10 h, which is comparable or even superior to those of the most promising MoP-based electrocatalysts in acid media reported to date. Most importantly, this work provides an elaborate strategy to design and fabricate high-efficiency and low-cost electrocatalysts utilizing POMOFs as precursors toward the HER

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据