4.6 Article

Synthesis, Characterization, and Electromagnetic Wave Absorption Properties of Composites of Reduced Graphene Oxide with Porous LiFe5O8 Microspheres

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 6, 期 8, 页码 10011-10020

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b01307

关键词

Etching method; rGO/porous LiFe5O8 composites; Permittivity; Permeability; Electromagnetic wave absorption

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51772177]
  2. Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of Shaanxi Province [2018JC-029]
  3. Shaanxi Science & Technology Coordination & Innovation Project of China [2017TSCXL-GY-08-05]
  4. Industrialization Foundation of Education Department of Shaanxi Provincial Government [16JF002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel three-dimensional composite of reduced graphene oxide sheets and porous LiFe5O8 micro spheres was fabricated via a facile, green, and highly tunable strategy, and the microstructure, composition, and microwave absorbing performances of the rGO/porous LiFe5O8 composite were characterized and investigated. The experimental results indicate that the porous LiFe5O8 microspheres are dispersed on the thin rGO sheets uniformly. Compared with the pure LiFe5O8 particles and porous LiFe5O8 microspheres, the as-prepared rGO/porous LiFe5O8 composites exhibit outstanding microwave-absorbing performances including efficient bandwidth and reflection loss. The rGO/porous LiFe5O8 composite (5-50) displays a maximum reflection loss of -53.4 dB at 12.2 GHz with a coating layer thickness of 2.2 mm and a broad effective bandwidth of 3.5 GHz (from 10.4 to 13.9 GHz). The outstanding microwave-absorbing performances are assigned to employing magnetic microflowers with multi-interfaces to improve impedance matching, which is ascribed to strong relaxation loss, electrical loss, and magnetic loss. This further confirms that the rGO/porous LiFe5O8 composites could be potential candidates for lightweight microwave-absorbing materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据