4.6 Article

Fate of Nanoplastics in Marine Larvae: A Case Study Using Barnacles, Amphibalanus amphitrite

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 6, 期 5, 页码 6932-6940

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b00766

关键词

microplastics; nanoplastics; marine pollution; barnacles; fluorescent particles; poly(methyl methacrylate)

资金

  1. National Research Foundation Singapore [R-143-000-676-281]
  2. St. John's Island National Marine Laboratory
  3. National University of Singapore

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The exposure of nanoplastics was investigated by observing their interaction with Amphibalanus amphitrite (commonly known as acorn barnacles). Poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) and fluorescent perylene tetraester (PTE) dye were used to prepare highly fluorescent nanoplastic particles. At concentrations of 25 ppm, the PMMA particles showed no detrimental impact on barnacle larvae and their microalgae feed, Tetraselmis suecica and Chaetoceros muelleri. PMMA nanoplastics were ingested and translocated inside the body of the barnacle nauplii within the first 3 h of incubation. The fluorescent PMMA particles inside the transparent nauplius were tracked using confocal fluorescence microscopy. Subsequently, the nanoplastics were fed to the barnacle nauplii under two conditions acute and chronic exposure. The results from acute exposure show that nanoplastics persist in the body throughout stages of growth and development from nauplius to cyprid and juvenile barnacle. Some egestion of nanoplastics was observed through moulting and fecal excrement. In comparison, chronic exposure demonstrates bioaccumulation of the nanoplastics even at low concentrations of the plastics. The impacts of our study using PMMA nanopartides exceeds current knowledge, where most studies stop at uptake and ingestion. Here we demonstrate that uptake of nanopartides during planktonic larval stages may persist to the adult stages, indicating potential for the long-term impacts of nanoplastics on sessile invertebrate communities.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据