4.6 Article

Mechanochemically Synthesized SnS Nanocrystals: Impact of Nonstoichiometry on Phase Purity and Solar Cell Performance

期刊

ACS SUSTAINABLE CHEMISTRY & ENGINEERING
卷 6, 期 3, 页码 3002-3009

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b02711

关键词

Tin sulfide; Mechanochemical; Nanocrystals; Thin-film solar cells; Nonstoichiomentry

资金

  1. KIST-UNIST [1.160097.01/2.160482.01]
  2. Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP)
  3. Ministry of Trade, Industry Energy (MOTIE) [20163010012580, 20163010012450]
  4. KIST institutional program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We demonstrate nontoxic, earth-abundant light absorbing SnS thin films fabricated by a low-cost, environmentally friendly nonvacuum process. SnS nanocrystals (NCs) are mechanochemically synthesized from elemental powders without the use of any other additives or solvents. To investigate the effect of the Sn-to-S stoichiometric ratio on the crystalline phase of the SnS NCs, the nonstoichiometry is systematically controlled from 0.95 (Sn0.95S) to 1.05 (Sn1.05S) by adjusting the mixing ratio of the Sn and S powders. The crystallographic evolution with the milling time signifies that the formation of the SnS phase follows a mechanochemically driven self-propagation reaction mechanism. The as-synthesized SnS NCs with a stoichiometric composition (i.e., Sn1.00S) are found to contain a Sn2S3 impurity phase in a non negligible amount, which can be subsequently eliminated by a post heat treatment at 500 degrees C in a reducing atmosphere. Interestingly, however, the formation of Sn2S3 during the mechanochemical synthesis process is greatly alleviated by introducing a Sn-excess composition (e.g., SnLosS). In addition, the solar cell with a Sn1.05S absorber exhibits a much higher efficiency as compared to the Sn0.95S- or Sn1.00S-based devices, which is likely attributed to the improved phase purity of Sn-excess SnS as well as to its better microstructure with higher crystallinity than the other compositions.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据