4.6 Article

Enriched Environment Elicits Proangiogenic Mechanisms After Focal Cerebral Ischemia

期刊

TRANSLATIONAL STROKE RESEARCH
卷 10, 期 2, 页码 150-159

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12975-018-0629-8

关键词

Enriched environment; Cerebral ischemia; Angiogenesis; Cerebral blood flow; Hepatocyte growth factor

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [81472150, 81702218]
  2. Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning, Key developing disciplines [2015ZB0401]
  3. National Institutes of Health [NS055104]
  4. Foundation Leducq
  5. Neuroendovascular Research Fund from the Andrew David Heitman Foundation
  6. Ellison Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Brain has limited capacity for spontaneous recovery of lost function after stroke. Exposure to enriched environment (EE) can facilitate functional recovery, but mechanisms underlying this effect are poorly understood. Here, we used a middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) model to investigate the impact of EE on angiogenesis in the post-ischemic brain in adult male Sprague Dawley rats, and examined whether blood-borne factors may contribute. Compared with standard cage (SC), exposure to EE was associated with greater improvement in neurological function, higher peri-infarct vascular density, and higher chronic post-ischemic cerebral blood flow assessed by laser speckle imaging. The effect persisted for at least 28days. EE also enhanced the expression of hepatocyte growth factor in the peri-ischemic cortex when measured 15days after MCAO. Interestingly, serum from rats exposed to EE after MCAO showed elevated levels of hepatocyte growth factor, and plasma or serum from rats exposed to EE after MCAO enhanced the survival and proliferation of cultured endothelial cells, in vitro, when compared with control plasma or serum from SC group after MCAO. Together, our data suggest that exposure to EE promotes angiogenesis in the ischemic brain that may in part be mediated by blood-borne factors.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据