4.7 Article

Antimicrobial and Chemotactic Activity of Scorpion-Derived Peptide, ToAP2, against Mycobacterium massiliensis

期刊

TOXINS
卷 10, 期 6, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/toxins10060219

关键词

antimicrobial peptide; mycobacteria inhibition; Mycobacterium; monocyte; neutrophil

资金

  1. INOVATOXIN project Network (Rede Centro-Oeste de Pos-graduacao, Pesquisa e Inovacao of Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico: CNPq-Brazil) [406334/2013-7]
  2. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Goias (FAPEG-Brazil) [88882.161533/2017/01]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Mycobacterium massiliense is a rapid growing, multidrug-resistant, non-tuberculous mycobacteria that is responsible for a wide spectrum of skin and soft tissue infections, as well as other organs, such as the lungs. Antimicrobial peptides had been described as broad-spectrum antimicrobial, chemotactic, and immunomodulator molecules. In this study we evaluated an antimicrobial peptide derived from scorpion Tityus obscurus as an anti-mycobacterial agent in vitro and in vivo. Bioinformatics analyses demonstrated that the peptide ToAP2 have a conserved region similar to several membrane proteins, as well as mouse cathelicidin. ToAP2 inhibited the growth of four M. massiliense strains (GO01, GO06, GO08, and CRM0020) at a minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) of 200 mu M. MBC concentration used to treat infected macrophages was able to inhibit 50% of the bacterial growth of all strains. ToAP2 treatment of infected mice with bacilli reduced the bacterial load in the liver, lung, and spleen, similarly to clarithromycin levels (90%). ToAP2 alone recruited monocytes (F4/80(low) Gr1), neutrophils (F4/80(-) Gr1), and eosinophils (F4/80+ Gr1+). ToAP2, together with M. massiliense infection, was able to increase F4/80(low) and reduce the percentage of F4/80(high) macrophages when compared with infected and untreated mice. ToAP2 has in vitro anti-microbial activity that is improved in vivo due to chemotactic activity.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据