4.7 Article

An Approach for Foliar Trait Retrieval from Airborne Imaging Spectroscopy of Tropical Forests

期刊

REMOTE SENSING
卷 10, 期 2, 页码 -

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/rs10020199

关键词

Airborne remote sensing; Borneo; Carnegie Airborne Observatory; foliar traits; imaging spectroscopy; Malaysia; PLSR; Sabah; Spectranomics; tropical forest

资金

  1. UN Development Programme GEF
  2. Avatar Alliance Foundation
  3. Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil
  4. Worldwide Fund for Nature
  5. Morgan Family Foundation
  6. Rainforest Trust
  7. Margaret A. Cargill Foundation
  8. David and Lucile Packard Foundation
  9. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  10. Grantham Foundation for the Protection of the Environment
  11. William M. Keck Foundation
  12. John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
  13. Andrew Mellon Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Spatial information on forest functional composition is needed to inform management and conservation efforts, yet this information is lacking, particularly in tropical regions. Canopy foliar traits underpin the functional biodiversity of forests, and have been shown to be remotely measurable using airborne 350-2510 nm imaging spectrometers. We used newly acquired imaging spectroscopy data constrained with concurrent light detection and ranging (LiDAR) measurements from the Carnegie Airborne Observatory (CAO), and field measurements, to test the performance of the Spectranomics approach for foliar trait retrieval. The method was previously developed in Neotropical forests, and was tested here in the humid tropical forests of Malaysian Borneo. Multiple foliar chemical traits, as well as leaf mass per area (LMA), were estimated with demonstrable precision and accuracy. The results were similar to those observed for Neotropical forests, suggesting a more general use of the Spectranomics approach for mapping canopy traits in tropical forests. Future mapping studies using this approach can advance scientific investigations and applications based on imaging spectroscopy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据