4.6 Article

mTOR acts as a pivotal signaling hub for neural crest cells during craniofacial development

期刊

PLOS GENETICS
卷 14, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007491

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIDCR NIH HHS [K12 DE023583] Funding Source: Medline

向作者/读者索取更多资源

mTOR is a highly conserved serine/threonine protein kinase that is critical for diverse cellular processes in both developmental and physiological settings. mTOR interacts with a set of molecules including Raptor and Rictor to form two distinct functional complexes, namely the mTORC1 and mTORC2. Here, we used novel genetic models to investigate functions of the mTOR pathway for cranial neural crest cells (NCCs), which are a temporary type of cells arising from the ectoderm layer and migrate to the pharyngeal arches participating craniofacial development. mTOR deletion elicited a proliferation deficit and excessive apoptosis of post-migratory NCCs, leading to growth arrest of the facial primordia along with midline orofacial clefts. Furthermore, NCC differentiation was impaired. Thus, NCC derivatives, such as skeletons, vasculatures and neural tissues were either rudimentary or malformed. We further demonstrate that disruption of mTOR caused P53 hyperactivity and cell cycle arrest in cranial NCCs, and lowering P53 activity by one copy reduction attenuated the severity of craniofacial phenotype in NCC-mTOR knockout mice. Remarkably, NCC-Rptor disruption caused a spectrum of defects minoring that of the NCC-mTOR deletion, whereas NCC-Rictor disruption only caused a mild craniofacial phenotype compared to the mTOR and Rptor conditional knockout models. Altogether, our data demonstrate that mTOR functions mediated by mTORC1 are indispensable for multiple processes of NCC development including proliferation, survival, and differentiation during craniofacial morphogenesis and organogenesis, and P53 hyperactivity in part accounts for the defective craniofacial development in NCC-mTOR knockout mice.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据