4.6 Article

Ancestry-specific recent effective population size in the Americas

期刊

PLOS GENETICS
卷 14, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007385

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [GM099568, HG005701]
  2. Division of Aging Biology and the Division of Geriatrics and Clinical Gerontology, NIA
  3. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) [N01-HC65233, N01-HC65234, N01-HC65235, N01-HC65236, N01-HC65237]
  4. NHLBI
  5. NIDCR [HHSN268201300005C AM03, MOD03]
  6. NHLBI HSN [26220/20054C]
  7. NCATS CTSI grant [UL1TR000123]
  8. NIDDK Diabetes Research Center (DRC) grant [DK063491]
  9. [1R01DK101855-01]
  10. [13GRNT16490017]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Populations change in size over time due to factors such as population growth, migration, bottleneck events, natural disasters, and disease. The historical effective size of a population affects the power and resolution of genetic association studies. For admixed populations, it is not only the overall effective population size that is of interest, but also the effective sizes of the component ancestral populations. We use identity by descent and local ancestry inferred from genome-wide genetic data to estimate overall and ancestry-specific effective population size during the past hundred generations for nine admixed American populations from the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos, and for African-American and European-American populations from two US cities. In these populations, the estimated pre-admixture effective sizes of the ancestral populations vary by sampled population, suggesting that the ancestors of different sampled populations were drawn from different sub-populations. In addition, we estimate that overall effective population sizes dropped substantially in the generations immediately after the commencement of European and African immigration, reaching a minimum around 12 generations ago, but rebounded within a small number of generations afterwards. Of the populations that we considered, the population of individuals originating from Puerto Rico has the smallest bottleneck size of one thousand, while the Pittsburgh African-American population has the largest bottleneck size of two hundred thousand.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据