4.6 Article

Quantitative Trait Loci Controlling Fruit Size and Other Horticultural Traits in Bell Pepper (Capsicum annuum)

期刊

PLANT GENOME
卷 11, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.3835/plantgenome2016.12.0125

关键词

-

资金

  1. Horticultural and Agronomy Graduate Group, Department of Plant Sciences, University of California-Davis
  2. Higher Educational Strategic Scholarships for Frontier Research Network from the Commission on Higher Education, Royal Thai Government

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) is a group of fruit vegetables that has large variation in fruit shape, fruit size, and horticultural traits. Using unadapted sources of germplasm to bring in novel alleles while maintaining favorable quality and horticultural traits is challenging for breeding in pepper. A genetic map with 318 loci from genotype-by-sequencing (GBS) and single nucleotide polymorphism assays was generated from a recombinant inbred line population derived from a cultivated bell-type C. annuum 'Maor' and a landrace highly resistant to Phytophthora capsici, 'Criollo de Morelos-334'. Forty-nine quantitative trait loci (QTLs) were detected for fruit, leaf, and horticultural traits with the scantwo permutation and stepwiseqtl methods from R/qtl. With the availability of a pepper reference genome and GBS data, candidate genes for pepper organ size and other horticultural traits were predicted. Big Brother, Ovate, and KLUH/CYP78A5 genes were candidate genes for controlling organ sizes on chromosome 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Two candidate genes controlling trichome formation in pepper are located at chromosome 10: TRICHOME BIREFRINGENCE-LIKE 5 and GLABROUS INFLORESCENCE STEMS. The A locus on chromosome 10, which encodes a member of the R2R3 MYB-domain family of proteins, has a function in anthocyanin accumulation. These QTL results and the candidate genes for each trait emphasize the genetic basis of the important traits for breeding with unadapted parents in bell pepper.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据