4.6 Article

Ginsenoside Rg(3) promotes inflammation resolution through M2 macrophage polarization

期刊

JOURNAL OF GINSENG RESEARCH
卷 42, 期 1, 页码 68-74

出版社

KOREAN SOC GINSENG
DOI: 10.1016/j.jgr.2016.12.012

关键词

ginseng; ginsenoside Rg(3); inflammation; resolution

资金

  1. Korean National Research Foundation - Korean government (MSIP) [2009-0083538]
  2. Korea-Japan Basic Scientific Cooperation Program [NRF-2015K2A2A4000081]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Background: Ginsenosides have been reported to have many health benefits, including anti-inflammatory effects, and the resolution of inflammation is now considered to be an active process driven by M2-type macrophages. In order to determine whether ginsenosides modulate macrophage phenotypes to reduce inflammation, 11 ginsenosides were studied with respect to macrophage polarization and the resolution of inflammation. Methods: Mouse peritoneal macrophages were polarized into M1 or M2 phenotypes. Reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, Western blotting, and measurement of nitric oxide (NO) and prostaglandin E-2 levels were performed in vitro and in a zymosan-induced peritonitis C57BL/6 mouse model. Results: Ginsenoside Rg(3) was identified as a proresolving ginseng compound based on the induction of M2 macrophage polarization. Ginsenoside Rg(3) not only induced the expression of arginase-1 (a representative M2 marker gene), but also suppressed M1 marker genes, such as inducible NO synthase, and NO levels. The proresolving activity of ginsenoside Rg(3) was also observed in vivo in a zymosan-induced peritonitis model. Ginsenoside Rg(3) accelerated the resolution process when administered at peak inflammatory response into the peritoneal cavity. Conclusion: These results suggest that ginsenoside Rg(3) induces the M2 polarization of macrophages and accelerates the resolution of inflammation. This finding opens a new avenue in ginseng pharmacology. (C) 2017 The Korean Society of Ginseng, Published by Elsevier Korea LLC.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据